<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Filtering is Dumb</title>
	<link>http://lukewelling.com/2006/02/28/internet-filtering-is-dumb/</link>
	<description>Just another nerd's weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 08:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://lukewelling.com/2006/02/28/internet-filtering-is-dumb/#comment-29442</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lukewelling.com/2006/02/28/internet-filtering-is-dumb/#comment-29442</guid>
		<description>I think it would be fair to say I am "against filtering completely".

Not that I care what you do in your home, but I don't like broken solutions being thrust upon me, and while I guess they might save unpleasant explanations to very young children, generally I think installing a home filter is a poor substitute for parental supervision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be fair to say I am &#8220;against filtering completely&#8221;.</p>
<p>Not that I care what you do in your home, but I don&#8217;t like broken solutions being thrust upon me, and while I guess they might save unpleasant explanations to very young children, generally I think installing a home filter is a poor substitute for parental supervision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://lukewelling.com/2006/02/28/internet-filtering-is-dumb/#comment-28414</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lukewelling.com/2006/02/28/internet-filtering-is-dumb/#comment-28414</guid>
		<description>So you basically are against filtering completely? Or are you just looking for better filters in public scenarios? 
I suppose that I should mention that I am very for content filtering, while at the same time free choice. When it comes down to it I don't really see kids having the same will power adults do. In fact I use http://www.contentwatch.com to filter my computers. Adults can get through it if need be, but kids don't see things that harm them. 
I don't know if there is a good situation for public scenarios though. I hate filters at work/school for tame stuff like youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you basically are against filtering completely? Or are you just looking for better filters in public scenarios?<br />
I suppose that I should mention that I am very for content filtering, while at the same time free choice. When it comes down to it I don&#8217;t really see kids having the same will power adults do. In fact I use <a href="http://www.contentwatch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.contentwatch.com</a> to filter my computers. Adults can get through it if need be, but kids don&#8217;t see things that harm them.<br />
I don&#8217;t know if there is a good situation for public scenarios though. I hate filters at work/school for tame stuff like youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
