Comments on: Jim Mirkalami Update: Legal Threats http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/ Just another nerd's weblog Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:58:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Rob http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/#comment-56084 Rob Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:55:49 +0000 http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/#comment-56084 That's especially amusing since, by making those comments, he put his name on your site. That’s especially amusing since, by making those comments, he put his name on your site.

]]> By: Lee http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/#comment-30923 Lee Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:28:06 +0000 http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/#comment-30923 Hi Luke, yes all material has been removed from my site as I just don't have the energy to deal with him. Hi Luke, yes all material has been removed from my site as I just don’t have the energy to deal with him.

]]> By: luke http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/#comment-30899 luke Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:55:32 +0000 http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/#comment-30899 I have a followup. The exact complaint is “Un-authorized[sic] publication of my personal name (un-konwingly[sic] at first knowingley[sic] and willingly after) cuasing[sic] seriouse[sic] damage to my reputation”. Now, I am not an expert on Canadian law, but ... I have a followup. The exact complaint is “Un-authorized[sic] publication of my personal name (un-konwingly[sic] at first knowingley[sic] and willingly after) cuasing[sic] seriouse[sic] damage to my reputation”.

Now, I am not an expert on Canadian law, but …

]]> By: stuart http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/#comment-30885 stuart Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:27:09 +0000 http://lukewelling.com/2008/03/31/jim-mirkalami-update-legal-threats/#comment-30885 The charge is that you *wrote his name*? And he's gonna hit you with legals because of it? Even if this is just lazy/bad English usage, I say "Balls to that". Any legal case would depend on some kind of defamation having happened. Just mentioning someone's name is not an offence. The charge is that you *wrote his name*? And he’s gonna hit you with legals because of it? Even if this is just lazy/bad English usage, I say “Balls to that”. Any legal case would depend on some kind of defamation having happened. Just mentioning someone’s name is not an offence.

]]>